Uh, if you’d not the intent to kill, then, why would you use so much brute force, and stabbed the other guy fourteen-centimeters, deep, huh??? The sorry excuse, to dodge the murder charges, off of the Front Page Sections, translated…
The man, Hong had a verbal altercation with a coworker, bought a fruit knife, stabbed the other person three times, killing him, he’d claimed, that he was only looking to teach the man a lesson that he’d not intent to murder when he was arrested. The courts based off of the coroner’s report, discovered that the victim had the injuries of fourteen-centimeter’s deep, that the blade of the knife was about nine-centimeters long, they’d deducted, that as Hong stabbed, he’d not just shoved the knife all the way in, that he’d also, tried to shove the knife’s handle into his coworker’s body too, didn’t show any sign of mercy, charged Hong on murder, sentenced him to fifteen years. This can be appealed.
The verdict found, that Hong and the deceased, Yen were coworkers on a contract, they’d not gotten along at all usually, on September first of last year, the two started verbally altercating in the dorm, afterwards, Hong went to the super convenience shop, bought a fruit knife, returned and saw Yen standing outside, used the knife, and stabbed toward Yen’s left and right shoulders, and back, as he saw Yen fell, he’d tossed the knife in a nearby ditch, went back to the dorm, packed up, and left.
After Yen was rushed to the hospital, because his pulmonary artery ruptured, he’d bled out, his left lung was filled with the blood form his injuries, his let lung collapsed, causing him to die. The police found the knife used for the attack, two hours after the stabbing, Hong was arrested.
Hong told, that Yen told him that he was the boss that day, that he was going to call someone, that to defend himself, he’d bought that knife. As he’d returned to the dormitory, saw Yen off the phones, he was drunk, and in the moment of anger, he’d used the knife to attack him. He’d only wanted to teach Yen a lesson, and didn’t anticipate murdering him.
The judge found, that there were three injuries on the deceased, the back stabbing which was fatal was through the thoracic cavities, the tip of the knife went forward, and got to just below the skin on the thorax in the front side, causing the spot-shaped contusion mark on the skin on the left thorax; the depth was about fourteen-centimeters, and the knife that was taken into evidence was about twenty-centimeters long, the handle about nine, the judge believed, that the knife went all the way in.
The other two injuries also had the half-circle shaped contusions, that the court deducted was from as the knife went all the way or almost all the way in, the force of contact from the skin with the handle, which showed how much brute force Hong used that he’d not, have any sense of mercy.
The review of the surveillance showed, that Hong waked up to Yen, used the knife, stabbed him at least three times, until those around them discovered him attacking, then he’d, stopped, and the judge believed, form the surveillance, that Hong didn’t want to just teach Yen a lesson, that he’d, intended to murder the man.
As Hong murdered Yen, he’d carried on in casual conversation with others, and packed up, readied to escape, and, he’d taken shots of Yen fallen to the ground, sent it to his mother as well as his friends, that his behaviors weren’t affected by the alcohol he was consuming, charged him on murder.
And so, this is how it’d ended, and, the man’s excuse was, busted, wide open, because the brute force he’d used, in stabbing the coworker to death, which didn’t fit to how he was just “trying to teach him a lesson”, because, normally, if you want to teach someone a lesson, and you’re fighting with the individual with a weapon, chances are, you’d only, slice his skin, instead of, stabbing him to death, with so much, brute force.