The government won’t even be held, accountable, if the vaccines that it’d vouched for, proved to be, ineffective or even, faulty, because of how it’d, set up the clauses of the agreements signed with the pharmaceutical companies! The bad measures of how this government, manipulated the systems, and it’s still we the people, who ended up, with the, shortest END of that, stick here!!! Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…
Without any warnings, the FDA here said it’d already, finished the EUA review for the locally produced vaccines. From before the government didn’t open up the proceedings of the time of the board meetings, not disclosed the names of the companies involved, and not specified in the records the personnel involved in the boards. Currently, the government only said, that it will open up the blacked out meeting records after the names of the involved personnel had been written on the records of the meetings. Comparing to the American methods of review. A lot of people mentioned, that as the FDA in U.S. signed off on the emergency uses of the vaccines, it’d publicized all records of the vaccines and related biological product advisory committee’s records, the information of the settings of the meetings, the outcomes, the video recording of the meetings.
U.S. is open on conferences like these, because of the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972. The tenth a1 mandated, that all the records of meetings shall open to the public; a2 stated, anyone with any involvement in the companies will be allowed in to the meeting, to express one’s opinions on various matters; 10b stated, based off of the information freedom act, all the data, reports, and any written records of these meetings, are saved, and opened to public to review if desired.
The 10c stated, all meeting records need to be detailed, and open to public. Naturally, if there are items that are, outside of the freedom of information clause, all of the above data can be closed to public review as well. But from the live streams of the FDA board meetings, it’d not believed, that the experts in the vaccine experts meetings have anything to keep away from general public’s knowledge.
More importantly, in the three branches of government of U.S., the executive department is the one, ultimately, responsible. And for this, the Federal Advisory Committee mandated, that all of the experts can only, play the role of “consultants”. All of the final decisions should be made, by the executive agencies to decide. The meanings of this regulation, is for the executive department to take up all responsibilities, and not delegate the responsibilities to the professional scholars.
how the normal process of EUA is passed…found online
Looking at us, the EUA proceedings of our vaccines, the fifth regulation: “…when necessary, to consult the experts”, meaning, that the meeting served only as a form of consultation means, not an evaluation, there’s not any voting to decide whatsoever.
The government doesn’t tell us when the meetings are being held, not allowing us to see the data being reviewed over by the committee members, only thing they told us was the results of their votes, that it was only for reference for the head of the FDA. And, the FDA already, switched out the members of the board that wasn’t in line with the government’s beliefs. But, the whole script seemed, to say, that this was, a professionally agreed-upon, expert opinion, that received the agreements from most of the experts.
In the EUA of the country’s own manufactured vaccines, it’d showed, of how the various executive departments having the “experts” vouch on their behalf, and it’d also shown, that blind spot of operation of democracy of Taiwan.
One the one hand, the data from the expert meetings aren’t open to public review, and we have no idea of knowing, what was discussed. Secondly, the identities, the comments of the experts aren’t disclosed, and, the experts don’t need to take responsibilities for what they’re stating. Third, the government pulled on many experts to speak on the behalf of the country’s own manufactured vaccines, stressing, that the government had the scientists to back them up; but in actuality, these so-called “experts”, were all, hand-selected by the government officials. In the future, if the vaccines manufactured here proved to have the efficacies, hooray; but if it doesn’t, then, the experts would be, the scapegoats for how the vaccines failed to protect.
and, this, is what the government is faced with, with its, current, review proceedings…
photo from online
In the government’s measures of defense against MERS, it’d wanted to advocate the nation’s own produced vaccines there’s nothing wrong with that; in the future, it may be proven, that the vaccines produced by Medigenvac is effective, it’s just, that we don’t know for sure yet. No matter, if this is the direction of the government’s policy making, then, it should be, brave to admit, that it is the government, that’s, allowed the vaccines to pass the evaluations, and, the government is going to, take responsibilities, for the outcomes of the vaccines being effective or not wholly.
But, the government is NOT stupid, why would it take responsibilities, for a vaccines that they pushed past evaluation? I mean, the evaluation processes aren’t even, real, the DDP had members of the evaluation committees who are their people, so they can pass the emergency use papers, and yet, if the vaccines produced here proved to be, faulty, it can always blame it on the evaluation committees, after all, they’re the ones, who should’ve, evaluated more thoroughly, but it didn’t, because the government told it not to, examine the facts thoroughly, so the vaccines can pass into, production. So it’s a win-win for a government, and a game of Russian roulette for us, the people here.
All I have to say, I've already said it, and, let's just say, that I'm someone who's ENDURED through a TON of losses in my life, and I still made it to the very top of MY game here, TADA!!!
Life, the Obstacle Course 
On the Evaluations of the Efficacy, the Safety of the Vaccines, the U.S. Opened the Processes for Review, But Does Taiwan Dare to?
The government won’t even be held, accountable, if the vaccines that it’d vouched for, proved to be, ineffective or even, faulty, because of how it’d, set up the clauses of the agreements signed with the pharmaceutical companies! The bad measures of how this government, manipulated the systems, and it’s still we the people, who ended up, with the, shortest END of that, stick here!!! Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…
Without any warnings, the FDA here said it’d already, finished the EUA review for the locally produced vaccines. From before the government didn’t open up the proceedings of the time of the board meetings, not disclosed the names of the companies involved, and not specified in the records the personnel involved in the boards. Currently, the government only said, that it will open up the blacked out meeting records after the names of the involved personnel had been written on the records of the meetings. Comparing to the American methods of review. A lot of people mentioned, that as the FDA in U.S. signed off on the emergency uses of the vaccines, it’d publicized all records of the vaccines and related biological product advisory committee’s records, the information of the settings of the meetings, the outcomes, the video recording of the meetings.
U.S. is open on conferences like these, because of the Federal Advisory Committee Act of 1972. The tenth a1 mandated, that all the records of meetings shall open to the public; a2 stated, anyone with any involvement in the companies will be allowed in to the meeting, to express one’s opinions on various matters; 10b stated, based off of the information freedom act, all the data, reports, and any written records of these meetings, are saved, and opened to public to review if desired.
The 10c stated, all meeting records need to be detailed, and open to public. Naturally, if there are items that are, outside of the freedom of information clause, all of the above data can be closed to public review as well. But from the live streams of the FDA board meetings, it’d not believed, that the experts in the vaccine experts meetings have anything to keep away from general public’s knowledge.
More importantly, in the three branches of government of U.S., the executive department is the one, ultimately, responsible. And for this, the Federal Advisory Committee mandated, that all of the experts can only, play the role of “consultants”. All of the final decisions should be made, by the executive agencies to decide. The meanings of this regulation, is for the executive department to take up all responsibilities, and not delegate the responsibilities to the professional scholars.
Looking at us, the EUA proceedings of our vaccines, the fifth regulation: “…when necessary, to consult the experts”, meaning, that the meeting served only as a form of consultation means, not an evaluation, there’s not any voting to decide whatsoever.
The government doesn’t tell us when the meetings are being held, not allowing us to see the data being reviewed over by the committee members, only thing they told us was the results of their votes, that it was only for reference for the head of the FDA. And, the FDA already, switched out the members of the board that wasn’t in line with the government’s beliefs. But, the whole script seemed, to say, that this was, a professionally agreed-upon, expert opinion, that received the agreements from most of the experts.
In the EUA of the country’s own manufactured vaccines, it’d showed, of how the various executive departments having the “experts” vouch on their behalf, and it’d also shown, that blind spot of operation of democracy of Taiwan.
One the one hand, the data from the expert meetings aren’t open to public review, and we have no idea of knowing, what was discussed. Secondly, the identities, the comments of the experts aren’t disclosed, and, the experts don’t need to take responsibilities for what they’re stating. Third, the government pulled on many experts to speak on the behalf of the country’s own manufactured vaccines, stressing, that the government had the scientists to back them up; but in actuality, these so-called “experts”, were all, hand-selected by the government officials. In the future, if the vaccines manufactured here proved to have the efficacies, hooray; but if it doesn’t, then, the experts would be, the scapegoats for how the vaccines failed to protect.
and, this, is what the government is faced with, with its, current, review proceedings…
In the government’s measures of defense against MERS, it’d wanted to advocate the nation’s own produced vaccines there’s nothing wrong with that; in the future, it may be proven, that the vaccines produced by Medigenvac is effective, it’s just, that we don’t know for sure yet. No matter, if this is the direction of the government’s policy making, then, it should be, brave to admit, that it is the government, that’s, allowed the vaccines to pass the evaluations, and, the government is going to, take responsibilities, for the outcomes of the vaccines being effective or not wholly.
But, the government is NOT stupid, why would it take responsibilities, for a vaccines that they pushed past evaluation? I mean, the evaluation processes aren’t even, real, the DDP had members of the evaluation committees who are their people, so they can pass the emergency use papers, and yet, if the vaccines produced here proved to be, faulty, it can always blame it on the evaluation committees, after all, they’re the ones, who should’ve, evaluated more thoroughly, but it didn’t, because the government told it not to, examine the facts thoroughly, so the vaccines can pass into, production. So it’s a win-win for a government, and a game of Russian roulette for us, the people here.
Share this:
Like this:
Related
About taurusingemini
All I have to say, I've already said it, and, let's just say, that I'm someone who's ENDURED through a TON of losses in my life, and I still made it to the very top of MY game here, TADA!!!