This man who’d, killed so many people, by committing arson, on the scooter of the man who tried to break up a fight that he got in at a food shop DESERVE the verdict all right! Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…
The man, Tang, seven years ago, was found to be at fault in the case of getting into a verbal altercation with the man, Weng, he’d set the scooters on fire, and, killed six of Weng’s next-of-kin, and, all the trials found him guilty, and gave him the death penalty, and the second trial by the Highest Courts tossed out the verdict, and sent the case back to get retried, and on the second retrial, the Highest Courts of Taiwan gave him the death penalty a fourth time, and stripped him of public office post for life and this can still be, appealed.
The courts’ second retrial pointed out, that based off of Tang’s motives, and how he’d gone to case the site multiple times, and moved the surveillance cameras, covered his face up, it’d shown that he was, thorough in planning, that he’d not been affected by mental illness, and showed signs of impulsion, chaos, or lack of judgment; based off of the psych evaluation of the Eastern Asian Hospital, they’d believed that Tang was completely aware that he was doing something wrong and illegal, that he’d not suffered from delusion nor auditory hallucination, that he’d not qualified for the reduction of the sentences.
The High Courts believed, that based off of the psych evaluation, there’s NO way of knowing if Tang can be reformed, or resocialized, and based off of his personality characteristics, there’s the predicted “possibilities of his losing his self control” again in the futures; and, Tang used the extremely cruel methods to commit the murders, lacking a conscience, and fitted to the pact’s “the most severe of crimes”, if the life term was given, then it would match up to the level of malice that Tang had shown in committing the crime, which showed there’s a need to keep him away from society for good, and the death penalty is still, assigned.
In 2014, Tang (age 50) had a verbal altercation with the owner of a restaurant, another customer, Weng saw, tired to break up the fight, and, he was sued by Tang, the judge found Tang lost. Tang carried a grudge, at around two in the morning on March 23rd or 2016, Tang used a extension rod to move the roadside surveillance out of focus, then, lit up the newspaper he’d soaked in gas, which he’d placed on the scooters. The fire broke out quickly, killing SIX of Weng’s next of kin, while Weng was away on his armed service term, and dodged death.
The district attorneys asked for the death penalty, the first and second trials found Tang guilty sentenced him to death, but the Highest Court used the fact that the courts failed to administer a psych evaluation, tossed it back for the lower courts to retry; the first retrial took in the Asian Eastern Hospital’s psych evaluation, showing that Tang was “exerting emotional trouble and emotional responses”, that he wasn’t severely depressed, the third death penalty was passed down. Last March, the Highest Courts tossed the case back for a retrial again for the second time, and the second retrial gave him the death penalty a fourth time yesterday.
And this murderer, DESERVED it too! He’d, killed someone who was, unrelated to the events that pissed him off, and, the psych evaluation showed that he was only, “emotional”, but not to the point of having a “psychological disorder”, meaning that he was, very aware of what he was doing, when he committed the arson, because a stranger saw him fighting with another customer, and tried helping to sort the issues out, as a mediator.