Yeah, uh, covering for someone you love, so totally, NOT the way, to do it!!! Off of the Front Page Sections, translated…
The fifty-six year-old female farm worker on the twenty-seventh of last month was killed by a vehicle as she was walking down the streets, the police found, that the man who drove the car was the forty-six year-old, Su, that he was suspected of driving drunk, he’d found his twenty-year-old son to take the fall for him, two days ago, the police called the four members of the involved party to the station, and busted their lies; Su admitted to having his son take the fall for him, but denied that he was intoxicated behind the wheels, the district attorneys after interrogations, filed for Su to be taken into custody, which the courts allowed, and the son who’d taken the fall also got charged, the two other individuals were sent back home.
At around five in the morn on the 27th of last month, Huang drove her pickup to get some fertilizers, she’d turned onto the 164 Highway from the industrial road, and was rammed from behind by Su, who has the right of way, the truck flipped, Huang flew out of the truck, and died.
The surveillance showed that the man was driving over 100 K/h, the police arrived, the twenty-year-old Su claimed that he drove the car, that he was taking his younger brother, and his younger brother’s girlfriend to open the shop; but members of the local community had captured footages of the crash, showing that he was by the side of the road, sliding on his cell phone, the investigators were also in doubt, how the three people were hit by a vehicle at a high speed, without any injuries to them.

After reviewing over the surveillance cameras all around, with the families providing the footages from the dash cam, the police found that the driver was in a white top, but the twenty-year-old Su was in a black shirt, and there was only one person in the car, they’d found that the forty-six year-old man, Su was a primary suspect, two days ago, all four people involved were all called to the station.
The forty-six year-old Su had priors in drunk driving, he’d admitted to calling his eldest son to take the fall, but was ambiguous on answering the police inquiries of whether or not he was drunk during the time of the accident; the eldest son also admitted to taking the fall for his father, and the youngest son, his girlfriend testified to it, but all three couldn’t be certain, if Su had, gotten behind the wheel drunk.
The D.A. believed, that Su drove drunk, killing the woman, was very serious, and he runs the chances of collaborating with the witnesses, asked the courts to have him in custody, which the courts mandated, and the twenty-year-old son who attempted to cover his father was also charged.
And so, because you can’t get caught again, for drunk driving, so you’d, called your son, to take the fall for you, and, him being a “good son”, actually did it, and, you two are now, caught, and found guilty of vehicular manslaughter, or was it, murder by vehicle??? Does it really matter? This still just showed, how the man thought he could, get away, getting his son to take the fall for him.