His Wife & Son Begged the Judge on His Behalf, But the Judge Discarded Their Pleads, and Still Gave Him a Harsh Sentence for Beating His Own Five-Year-Old Daughter to Death

Now, tell me there’s NOTHING wrong with this “picture”, but, despite how this man MURDERED his own young daughter in such a brutal manner, his wife still begged on his behalf???  From the Front Page Sections, translated…

The Five-Year-Old Young Girl’s Lacking in Her Bodily Controls Was Physically and Severely Abused by Her Own Father, Huang Multiple Times, at the End of Two Years Ago, Huang Used a Scratching Stick and a Hanger, Beaten the Young Child Up, and Kicked Her Stomach, Causing the Child to Suffer a Fatal Head Injury.  In the First Trial, Huang Was Sentenced to Nine-Years-Ten-Months for Brutally Beating His Own Young to Death, and Huang’s Wife and His Two Other Young Sons Begged the Courts for Mercy, Claiming, “It’s Because She Misbehaved that Was Why She Was Being Physically Punished”, But the Highest Courts in Taiwan Maintained the Rulings Yesterday.

The judge residing over this case, Liang called out to the government, to quickly patch up the safety nets in the society.  He said, recently, there’d been multiple cases of child abuse, and, as the victims were found, their either fatally wounded or already dead, and then, the hospital notified the police, and, some of the cases had caused public anger, but, having the angry lynching mob isn’t a sign of a healthy society, there are many cases of child abuse that came up, the government must take measures, to help prevent more cases from happening.

He also said, the justice systems is the last gate of defense, and, unless the families of the victims decided to press charges, otherwise, the courts wouldn’t take the matter into considerations, and, most of the abused children are all under age six, couldn’t save themselves, he’d hoped that the social workers and the local offices can make scheduled visits to the families with young children in the neighborhoods, and the neighbors need to get a bit “nosy” too, so the help that needed comes in time.  The Collectivist Court also mentioned, there’s the law to prevent against abuse in young children, that abusing children to death is different from serious injuries causing death, that the departments responsible in overseeing the cases need to take actions to quickly patch up the broken, incomplete parts of this network too.

The thirty-eight year-old Huang has two sons and a daughter with his wife, the five-year-old youngest daughter is slower ot learn, and would often go to the bathrooms on the floors, Huang believed that “I can’t even train her to go to the potty”, and had often, beaten up, whipped her using the coat hangers.  Two years ago on December 17^th, the child sustained the fatal injuries, causing her to go into shock, then die, Huang admitted to physically hurting his own young, but denied having tortured or abused her, claimed it was only disciplinary measures he’d taken to “train” her.

As the High Courts opened up, Huang testified “I was taught, using this method when I was a young child too!”  Huang’s wife stated, that she didn’t send her daughter to school, her husband taught her to read, and because he wanted to see the results of his teaching her that was why he’d used the physical punishments on her, she’d hoped that the judge can be lenient in sentencing him.  The eldest brother of the young child said, that his dad was very kind to all three of them, that it was because his youngest sister was naughty, that she got punished, and spoke on his father’s behalf, “We didn’t get abused, it’s not that over”, everybody gets punished when we do something wrong, “I hope you can give him a lighter sentence”.

The high courts believed, that as a father, Huang has the duties to protect and to teach his children, and because his daughter wasn’t potty trained yet, he’d not used the right measures to train, to teach her, or taken to the hospital to get treatments, he’d, caused her to be murdered.  Counting up ht enumber of times, the durations, the measure he took, to abusing her, it goes, way beyond the normal reasons of punishments, teaching, that it would be considered as “torture’, that sentencing him to nine years ten months was more than reasonable, the judge tossed back the appeal.

But, based off of what this young children weathered through, nine years in prison is still, too lenient, you MURDERED your own young, because she wasn’t, potty trained, and, maybe her not being trained to go to the potty, after she should’ve been able to get potty trained WAS a sign of something (developmentally delayed, perhaps???) but instead, you didn’t take her to the hospital to get examined, you just, BEAT the SHIT out of your own young, murdering her in such a brutal manner, and what’s worse was, your young sons, and your wife spoke on your behalf, that would be, the long-term adverse effects, of being raised up in an abusive background, you wouldn’t even THINK that abuse was wrong, but it WAS!