After the death on the investigation of a young infant, because it can’t be proven, that the nanny’s behaviors was a direct cause of this young infant’s death, from the Front Page Sections, translated…
A Three-Months-Old Infant Girl from Hsinbei City Two Years Ago in February, Started Crying, and Fell Limp, and Because She’d Suffered Brain Damage, She’d Been on the Ventilators Ever Since; the Hospital Diagnosed Her Difficulties as Being Caused by Shaken Baby Syndrome, the Infant’s Parents Thus, Accused the Nanny, Kao for Causing Injury to Their Young. But the Hsinbei District Court Believed, that there’s Not Enough Evidence that Proved that the Nanny Had, Injured the Infant, and the Parents Pressed Charges Against the Nanny, Kao for Negligence. But the Hsinbei District Court Believed, that there’s NOT Sufficient Proof to Cause that Kao Had Injured the Infant by Inappropriately Shaking Her, and, Although the Court’s Heart Goes Out to the Parents, It’d Still Found Kao Not Guilty.
The Collectivist Courts in the verdict, quoted the Justice, Hsu’s explanation Number 670.
The verdict stated, Kao the nanny, on January 18th two yeas ago, taken the job of caring for the young infant girl, the working hours were Monday through Friday, from 7:30 to 7:30. On the afternoon of February 19th, after Kao feed the infant her bottle, the infant started crying nonstop, and, as she was taken to the hospital to get treated, and the doctors discovered her to have subdural hematoma, anoxia causing brain damage, as well as the bleeding of her retina, and confirmed it to be “shaken baby syndrome”.
And because the infant showed the signs during the nanny’s care, the infant’s parents filed a negligence suit against Kao. As the court was in session, Kao stressed she’d not shaken the infant, that after she’d fed the infant her bottle, she had, burped her, then, changed her diaper, then, she’d heard the infant cry, and found that she’d become, lethargic, felt that something wasn’t, quite right, and had her neighbor help notified the infant’s parents, and she’d taken the infant on a cab to the hospital immediately.
And because the reports from the hospital showed, that the subdural hematoma in the brain of the young infant occurred within seven days, other than Kao, the infant’s parents, and other families had taken care of her too, and thus, the court’s cant conclude, that the damages were caused on the day of the hospitalization, found Kao not guilty, but this can be appealed.
And, because there’s NO proof that the injuries of the young infant was sustained during her being in the nanny’s care, plus, there were, other family members who’d, “handled” the young infant, so, the courts found the woman, NOT guilty. But someone IS guilty, for the injuries on this young girl, we just don’t know WHO should take the blames exactly!
Life, the Obstacle Course 