A “dissection” of the current political governments, on how electing those who had NO prior experiences in politics, or governing, can affect a country’s future, from the Front Page Sections, translated…
The leaders of the world without any prior political experiences, along with public opinions, had spread throughout the world right now, but, the fact is, that this only happened, in the democratic countries of the world right now. Meaning that, although the history from years before didn’t have this trend, however, the democratic elections that started, from before, had made the twins of public opinions and leaders with no prior experiences in governing of a country.
The “classic” system of populists’ government in Latin America offered a comparative in politics in the field of populist research. Based off of the examinations of the governing bodies in Latin America, the basic concepts of populist rule showed the following: 1. a socialist head of the government, through agricultural, labor, and social policies, to make sure that the leaders gained the supports from the general public, thus, gaining the right to rule. 2. with the above power as a backup, pushing forth, and forming the economical bodies based off of that. Meaning, that the classic populist belief meant, “those leaders with a special charm, to comply with the opinions of the major public, to help the economic growths, to make politics, into a movement of the masses”.
It’s just, that as we try to apply this method that worked in only Latin American countries, it’s, actually, quite difficult. On one side, as the militant rules of the Latin American countries were, overthrown, the new populist systems, which utilized the new classic’s free economy policies, this trend makes it hard, for the researchers, to categorize the characteristics of the systems.
At the same time, we see recently, that Western European countries had, shifted from the developmentalism’s post developing countries, and there are the, extremist right “race=nationality” belief’s populist governments, it’d shocked the researchers, at the same time, it’d, captured the variety and showed how ordinary the populist governments are, becoming. Today, the populism can no longer get defined by the social economic or specific politic’s, at the same time, it’s, also, no longer a transition of the countries modernization process.
The populist and amateur politicians is not, closely connected to democracy. Because, in the modern day constitutions, there’s, a close link between the power struggles for balance, and the weighing of the pros and cons of the systems, which caused the complications of the political systems in the world.
So, the writer of this article believed, that the populist rules and the amateur politics are only, the internalization of democracy. And, there’s no need to get upset by it, or get excited by it.
And so, this, is how the world’s leadership is heading towards, we are now, electing those with, absolutely, NO prior governing experiences, like the world’s major leaders right now (not mentioning any names here!!!), and it’s because, the citizens voted for these people, because, maybe they’re, drawn to believe, that hey, s/he used to be one of us, ordinary citizens, and, if we vote for her/him, s/he may, have our (the working class???) best interests in mind, but, do they? Of course N-O-T! Because, this world will always be governed by what benefitted ME the most!!!
Life, the Obstacle Course 