How UNEDUCATED we all are, of what GENDER-EQUALITY really means, and if the JUDGES don’t have a clue, then, how can you expect the people in this country to be well-educated on the matter? From the Front Page Sections, translated…
The judge, Ji-Hsiang Chen had gone on the press for many interviews, and defended the judge, Hong-Bing Chen’s improper actions toward a female assistant, and there were, words that were “gold”, spoken by him, “Blocking the door so his assistant couldn’t get out wasn’t him, entangling with her” or, “Kissing his assistant is just flirting”, “Hugging one another for miniscule of seconds is general courtesy”, and, “Judge Hong-Bing Chen merely made a failed attempted at starting an extramarital affair”, etc., etc., etc., his beliefs, SHOCKED a lot of those in the media, it’d made the Judges’ Association felt compelled, to clarify, late at night, that they would recommend that Justice Chen be sent to the evaluations. From the interview with Justice Chen, there were, THREE mistakes, worth mentioning to the public, and for the Justice Department to consider.
First, Justice Ji-Hsiang Chen is only an executive judge not a case judge in the case, and, the primary task that he had was to determine, if after Justice Hong-Bing Chen did what he’d done, was he still, suitable, to carry his post as a justice of the court? Justice Ji-Hsiang Chen claimed, that Justice Hong-Bing Chen’s actions aren’t yet to the point of sexual harassment, but, the duties court doesn’t need to rule on whether or not his behaviors constitutes as sexual harassment, but instead, if he was still, fitted for the post of a justice of the court, after his “blocking his assistant from leaving his office against her will”, “inviting her out for a walk, to start an affair with him”, and “not getting consent from his assistant, and kissing her”, etc., etc., etc.
the male AND female “versions” of it, photo from online…
Justice Ji-Hsiang Chen believed, that all of Justice Hong-Bing Chen’s behaviors hadn’t reached the extent of it being considered as sexual harassment, this was based off of the mentality of “guilty conscience” and allowing it to rule the jobs of the justices of the court, this was, the very FIRST mistake.
Secondly, sexual harassment included, “sexual harassment in a hostile environment”, the former, using sex, or gender, to make someone else uncomfortable, to make the individual’s time at work or study hard; the latter, using sex or gender, to discriminate, to not treat a member of the opposite sex as equals. For instance, keep on making sexist remarks, or telling sex jokes on the job, mocking others, mocking those with a different sexual orientation, creating a hostile work environment; and in the schools, the instructors with the rights to give out the grades, using the excuse of wanting a romantic relationship with a student, causing the students pressure, worrying, that if they don’t agree, it may affect their grades, or they couldn’t graduate, this also, constitutes as sexual harassment.
Justice Chen failed to understand: that the CORE of prevention of sexual harassment is to prevent the ABUSE of POWER! So, it goes beyond commenting on how his assistant shouldn’t get involved with other men, etc., etc., etc. Justice Chen’s behaviors clearly showed, that he’d lacked the beliefs of these basic rules, but, Justice Ji-Hsiang Chen’s LACKING in such knowledge, is the second error.
this constitutes as sexual harassment in the workplace! Not my photograph…
Third, there are, information sensitive to the case of gender, Justice Ji-Hsiang Chen learned the details of the case that had been, kept from the public’s knowledge, and, to prevent the victims from being hurt a second time, the law placed the BAR on the privacy of the matters. And Justice Chen, in the pressing matter of clarifying, blurted out the details of the case he shouldn’t have disclosed to the public, injuring the victim repeatedly again. How we couldn’t give the victims of these crimes a friendly environment, and lacking in privacy, should be what the justice systems improve on.
As I worked as an attorney, I’d had two cases ruled by justice Ji-Hsiang Chen, and felt that he was very attentive and responsible judge. But after this, whether it be his beliefs about the law, or the comments he’d made, it’d, clearly, showed the LACK of knowledge on gender equality. As for Justice Hong-Bing Chen’s sexual harassment of his female office assistant, should NEVER have been, tolerated. There’s still a long ways to travel in gender equality in this country, and we shall, all work hard together, and keep in mind, that protecting the victims was our primary goal.
Either that the justice all BANNED together, or that, they’re, ALL BRAIN-DEAD, either way, this still doesn’t “look” good for this country, think about it, what kind of a place would we be in, if the justices of the courts all are so totally, FUCKING retarded, and uneducated, on the matter of gender equality and what constitutes as SEXUAL harassment?
Life, the Obstacle Course 