You’d, deserted your wife and child when your children were still young, and now you’re growing old, you’d wanted them to, what, PAY for your livelihood??? Why should they, huh??? From the Front Page Sections, translated…
A man, Huang, in his earlier years had, abandoned his wife and children, and had a stroke in his elderly years, with an S.T.D., he’d turned back to his own children, and ASKED them for money to live off of; the three siblings stated, that they were abandoned by their own father, and they felt taken that he’d come back and asked for money from them. Huang’s wife also told, that over the years, she’d been the one, making all the money to support her family, that her children had once only had porridge and soy sauce for their meals at one time in their lives. The judge believed, that Huang never fulfilled his paternal duties toward his own young, and that the children didn’t need to pay for his living in his elderly years.
Huang’s daughter pointed out, that in the fifth grade, her father left home, and she and her younger brother lived with their mother for two years, then, because their mother needed to make the money to live off of, she’d sent them to their eldest uncle’s home to stay.
A few years later after she’d graduated from middle school, she’d part-timed through her high school years, that during the period of time, her father NEVER even bothered to come back to see how they were doing, or fulfilled ANY of his responsibilities as their father either. Until he had a stroke, and contracted an STD, then he’d, come back to them, demanding the alimony and support to live off of, that it wasn’t right.
She’d told the judge, that over the years, her father never had any sort of an interactions with his own young, that there’s no real parent-child relations between them, that other than deserting the three of them, hurting them very much, she’d asked the courts to allow them to NOT pay for their father’s elderly care.
Huang’s wife also testified, that thirty-two years ago after she’d married Huang, they’d had three children, but, it was her mother-in-law who’d looked after them, until her eldest started kindergarten, then, she’d taken her home to raise, that although her husband drove a cab, but he’d rarely brought the money he’d earned home, that she’d supported the household economics by doing the handicrafts, and worked as a service maid at a hotel.
The judge reviewed the facts, that since Huang’s children were young, to now, he’d not fulfilled the responsibilities for raising them, abandoned his wife and children, causing the three children to not have the love of their father growing up, that it was their mother, and the eldest brother-in-law who’d, raised them up, that he’d not taken any part in their upbringing, and that his children didn’t have any obligations toward him now.
This case still showed, that IF you don’t show care, concern, or love toward your own young when they were younger, then, they have absolutely ZERO (that’s 0 for those of you who are “visual”!) obligations, to care for you as you’d grown old and gray, and the judge made the right calls allowing the children of this DEADBEAT father to not support him in his living!1