The IMPROPER behaviors of an ADULT, and it still didn’t matter if the student is “of age”, or if she’d consented! From the Front Page Sections, translated…
The manager of a cram school, Huang was suspected of being in love with a first-year-high school female student, was suspected of taking her to motels in Taipei and Keelung, to have sex after her cram school sessions multiple times, and texted sexually-illicit messages of “You can call me daddy” to her; last year in the late evening of the month of November, they’d had sex inside his car, and was discovered by the police, the adolescent told, that in two short months, she’d had sex with Huang at least thirty-eight times, and pleaded on his behalf too. The D.A. indicted Huang on having sexual relations with an underage minor.
The investigators found, that the thirty-seven year-old Huang is married, and worked a math instructor and a manager at the cram school for over a decade. The adolescent girl went to the cram school in her last year of middle school, in her first year of high school, she was attracted by his looks, and they’d started dating. The police said, that Huang had taken the adolescent to get the “extra tutoring sessions” alone after the cram school sessions, and had texted her, “Call me daddy if you want to”, along with other sorts of sexually illicit messages.
Late one night last November, the patrol officers were making the rounds, arrived at the parking lot of Dawulung Cannon site, found a vehicle, rocking, and the woman inside was wearing a school uniform, they’d immediately taken them both into the station.
The adolescent girl claimed, that she’d admired Huang, and, in two short months since school started last year, they’d had sex at least thirty times in motels in Keelung and Taipei.
Huang denied having taken the adolescent to the motels, claimed that they’d had sex just once in the parking lot. He’d claimed, that the adolescent student and him were consensual, that he’d not done anything against her wills; the adolescent also begged on the behalf of Huang, claimed that she was in love with him, that she wasn’t forced against her will. After the young woman’s father learned, he’d insisted on suing Huang.
The Keelung D.A.’s Office used the injury reports of the adolescent female, as well as their conversations, along with the records of them checking into the motels, prosecuted Huang.
Yeah, uh, are you SHITTING me??? This young woman WAS a student, and, this LOSER, an ADULT, and yet, this man abused this young girl’s infatuations toward him, and, had sex with her, an UNDERAGE minor, and, it still did NOT matter if it was consensual, at least, have the sense, to WAIT until she’s “of age” (either seventeen, or eighteen, how should I know???), and yet, because two people can’t keep their HANDS to themselves, this ADULT got SUED!