A Married Woman Was Found to Have Fellated Someone Else’s Husband 24 Times, But There Was No Evidence of Adultery

So, having the PHYSICAL EVIDENCE collected, would bring a CONVICTION in adultery in this case, but there’s a lack of it here, from the Front Page Section, translated…

A man Chang had an extramarital affair with his female coworker, Lin, after his wife found out about it, he’d admitted to having twenty-four sexual intercourses with Lin, and turned over the photographs of her fellating him as evidence to her; Lin admitted to fellating the man, but claimed that they didn’t have coitus, and the judge believed her, believed that it didn’t constitute as obstruction of family, and found her not guilty.

The legal definition for adultery originally meant man and woman engaging in sexual intercourse, coitus, that fellatios are behaviors that satisfied the sexual arousal; and although back in 1999, the laws of definitions of sexual intercourse were amended to “using one’s sex organs and penetrating it into someone else’s sexual organs, anus, or mouth”, that it’d fitted to the ruling of obstructions of sexual freedoms, but the penal codes on adultery had not been amended back then.

Because Chang’s wife found hickies on his neck, she’d forced it out of him, and he’d admitted to seeing a female coworker, Lin, and because he’d wanted his wife to forgive him, he’d turned over the photos of them engaging in fellatio, said, that the two of them had a total of twenty-four sexual intercourses in various places, like her residence, motels, his own car; Chang’s wife pursued the other woman.

At the courts, Lin admitted to having fellated Chang, but denied having sexual intercourse with him; she said that she was there at his wedding banquet, and Chang claimed that he’d not gone to register for his marriage at the land offices yet, she thought that his marriage is wife wasn’t valid, that, was why she’d agreed to keep dating him; and because Chang didn’t settle his marriage yet, she thought that sex would be too disgusting, and insisted on not allowing him to.

The judge reviewed over the photographs of the fellatio, and found, that they were both properly dressed, and in other photos of hugging, kissing too, they both loved selfies, but, there’s no indications of further adulterous behaviors.

The judge believed, that if they can photograph the fellatio sessions, how could the twenty-four times of adulterous behaviors be undocumented, and Chang LINED Lin on “If you feel disgusted about having sex with me, you don’t need to”, “I can not touch you, until that day”, enough to see, that, coitus hadn’t happened in the photos, as well as from the conversations too.

The judge stressed, that Lin and Chang had intimate contacts and fellatios, that they should be held responsible for causing the damages to Chang’s wife’s marriage to her husband, but, fellatios don’t constitute as sexual intercourse, that it’d not met the requirements for obstruction of family, the courts found Lin not guilty.

So, this pair of people having an affair got a free pass, a SLAP on the wrist, a warning, and this would open up the doors for future cases like this, because this was, a BAD precedence, because if you need proof, for adultery, for it to count in the courts, and, adulterous behaviors are usually kept secret, until the man becomes tired of it, then, he will start, dropping off hints left and right, for his wife to pick up…