The Father Abandoned the Son When He Was Growing Up Out of Malice, and the Son Was Granted the Right to Not Take Care of the Father as He’d Become Elderly

Your bad deeds had, come back to BITE yourself on the ASS now, haven’t they!!!  From the Front Page Sections, translated…

A man, Chiu, used the fact, that back when his father was younger, he’d abandoned his wife and child, and after he’d divorced his mother, asked the courts, to not be responsible for paying for the child support, claimed, that “You didn’t take care of me, so I’m not going to take care of you either”, asked the courts to allow him, to not be responsible, for paying for the father’s care at old age; Chiu’s mother and his father’s sister testified that “it’s true”, the judge agreed.  Chiu’s father can fight to have the ruling tossed back, but, if the next judge tossed back the case, then, if later, Chiu’s father filed for the supportive care, then, Chiu had the right to say no.

The attorney, Pan pointed out, that filing for not paying for the support of one’s own aging parents is a right that is “formed”, that it can act alone, unlike in cases of damages, when everything would be set into motion, when the other party started suing.  In the past, the asking of alimony and support usually came from parents, there were, rarely any cases where the children were the plaintiffs; actually, the children can start the motions, and not wait until the parents filed for the claims, then, file for a case to get the claims tossed back.

The thirty-two year-old Chiu pointed out, that some twenty years ago, his father divorced his mother, and he was very young, he’d lived with his mother, and his father NEVER paid a cent of child support, they’d lived off of his mother’s measly wages from her hard labor, they were, nearly, poverty stricken.  And because his father never once visited them, it was an abandonment by malice from his father, he wasn’t willing, to pay for his own father’s care at old age, asked the courts to allow him, to not be responsible, to pay for his father’s care in his elderly years.

When the court was in session, the judge had called on Chiu’s father multiple times, and he’d not shown up at all, and, the assigned lawyers were, never present either, there weren’t any opinions on the matter at all.

The judge called the mother to the stand, and she’d testified, that her ex never gave her any money for the household at all, would leave home for a long time, then come back, and, she had NO idea where he’d gone, when he was away.  Her son had lived with her since the beginning, and, for twenty years, her ex had not visited, she’d taken care of all the household finances.  Chiu’s aunt from his father’s side also testified, that her older brother rarely came home, didn’t bring any money back either, that she’d put up the money, to help bring up her own nephew.

The judge took the mother and the aunt’s words to be truth, and believed, that Chiu’s father had not fulfilled his responsibilities as a father, and had, maliciously, abandoned his own son, and, with all the evidences, the judge ruled, that Chiu didn’t have to pay to care for his own father’s old age.

And this still just showed???  Oh yeah, IF you’re a DEADBEAT who’d abandoned your children when they were growing up, then, you have NO right, to ASK your young to pay to care for you at old age, and, you will, need your young, to help put you up into a home of sorts, but, because you’d NEVER given a SHIT about your kids when they were growing up, now, they won’t have to pay for keeping you either!